Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYW vs XLG: how they differ

IYW and XLG hold 51% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and XLG hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYW and XLG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYWXLG
NVIDIA CORPORATION16.25%13.10%
APPLE INC.13.65%10.76%
ALPHABET INC.7.84%6.05%
ALPHABET INC.6.34%4.82%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION3.99%8.18%
BROADCOM INC.3.78%4.85%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.81%3.61%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.3.50%1.56%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.1.86%0.86%
ORACLE CORPORATION1.67%0.74%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED1.57%0.69%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT1.32%0.58%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYWOnly in XLG
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%Amazon.com, Inc. 6.99%
INTEL CORPORATION 2.56%Tesla, Inc. 2.90%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 1.99%Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 2.35%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 1.92%JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.28%
KLA CORPORATION 1.41%Eli Lilly and Co. 2.00%
ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 1.21%Exxon Mobil Corp. 1.74%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.18%Walmart Inc. 1.56%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.10%Visa Inc. 1.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

IYW and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isU.S. TechnologyS&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year+34.9%+12.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.4 pts−5.3 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.20%
Already in the S&P 50095.5%100.0%
Holdings13951

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or XLG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +34.9% and XLG returned +12.2%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYW or XLG?
IYW charges 0.37% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so XLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of IYW and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 51% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYW against XLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYW-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources