Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYW vs VONG: how they differ

IYW and VONG hold 56% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and VONG hold 56% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYW and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYWVONG
NVIDIA CORPORATION16.25%13.09%
APPLE INC.13.65%11.97%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION3.99%8.98%
ALPHABET INC.7.84%3.91%
BROADCOM INC.3.78%5.78%
ALPHABET INC.6.34%3.15%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.81%3.20%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.3.50%1.47%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION1.99%1.21%
ORACLE CORPORATION1.67%1.15%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.1.86%1.03%
KLA CORPORATION1.41%0.76%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYWOnly in VONG
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
INTEL CORPORATION 2.56%Tesla Inc 3.48%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT 1.32%Eli Lilly & Co 2.67%
ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 1.21%Visa Inc 1.57%
SANDISK CORPORATION 0.96%Costco Wholesale Corp 1.28%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION 0.91%Mastercard Inc 1.20%
CORNING INCORPORATED 0.79%AbbVie Inc 1.16%
Coherent Corp. 0.34%Netflix Inc 1.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IYW and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. TechnologyRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+34.9%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.4 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50095.5%95.6%
Holdings139387

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +34.9% and VONG returned +7.2%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYW or VONG?
IYW charges 0.37% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of IYW and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 56% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYW against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYW-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources