Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYW vs VGT: how they differ

IYW and VGT hold 74% of their weight in the same names.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and VGT hold 74% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYW and VGT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYWVGT
NVIDIA CORPORATION16.25%16.85%
APPLE INC.13.65%14.59%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION3.99%9.47%
BROADCOM INC.3.78%4.21%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.3.50%3.21%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.2.98%4.21%
INTEL CORPORATION2.56%2.03%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION1.99%1.56%
ORACLE CORPORATION1.67%1.46%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.1.92%1.40%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.1.86%1.35%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED1.57%1.11%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYWOnly in VGT
ALPHABET INC. 7.84%Cisco Systems Inc 1.85%
ALPHABET INC. 6.34%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.81%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.81%Arista Networks Inc 0.69%
VERTIV HOLDINGS CO 0.77%Accenture PLC 0.47%
DOORDASH, INC. 0.38%NXP Semiconductors NV 0.38%
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC. 0.12%Ciena Corp 0.37%
REDDIT, INC. 0.12%Motorola Solutions Inc 0.30%
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC. 0.09%TE Connectivity PLC 0.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IYW and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. TechnologyInformation technology
Total return, 1 year+34.9%+35.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.4 pts+17.9 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50095.5%86.9%
Holdings139317

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

VGT in plain words

VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or VGT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +34.9% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYW or VGT?
IYW charges 0.37% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of IYW and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 74% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYW against VGT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYW-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources