Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYW vs VBR: how they differ

IYW and VBR hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and VBR hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYW and VBR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYWVBR
JABIL INC.0.21%0.87%
FLEX LTD.0.21%0.32%
QNITY ELECTRONICS, INC.0.18%0.37%
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.0.12%0.28%
F5, INC.0.11%0.50%
CDW CORPORATION0.11%0.39%
TD SYNNEX CORPORATION0.11%0.41%
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.0.09%0.37%
SS&C TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC.0.09%0.14%
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC.0.07%0.22%
GEN DIGITAL INC.0.07%0.29%
GARTNER, INC.0.06%0.18%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYWOnly in VBR
NVIDIA CORPORATION 16.25%NRG Energy Inc 0.66%
APPLE INC. 13.65%Tapestry Inc 0.64%
ALPHABET INC. 7.84%Atmos Energy Corp 0.62%
ALPHABET INC. 6.34%Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.99%Moderna Inc 0.54%
BROADCOM INC. 3.78%Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.50%US Foods Holding Corp 0.48%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%JB Hunt Transport Services Inc 0.47%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IYW and VBR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. TechnologySmall-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+34.9%+16.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.4 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50095.5%30.5%
Holdings139840

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or VBR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +34.9% and VBR returned +16.3%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYW or VBR?
IYW charges 0.37% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of IYW and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYW against VBR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYW-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources