Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYW vs VB: how they differ

IYW and VB hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and VB hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYW and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYWVB
JABIL INC.0.21%0.49%
FLEX LTD.0.21%0.36%
QNITY ELECTRONICS, INC.0.18%0.21%
Astera Labs, Inc0.15%0.45%
Everpure, Inc0.14%0.30%
ENTEGRIS, INC.0.13%0.33%
TWILIO INC.0.13%0.38%
LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.0.12%0.16%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC0.12%0.32%
F5, INC.0.11%0.29%
CDW CORPORATION0.11%0.22%
TD SYNNEX CORPORATION0.11%0.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYWOnly in VB
NVIDIA CORPORATION 16.25%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
APPLE INC. 13.65%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
ALPHABET INC. 7.84%Natera Inc 0.45%
ALPHABET INC. 6.34%EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.99%NRG Energy Inc 0.38%
BROADCOM INC. 3.78%MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.50%Tapestry Inc 0.36%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%Casey's General Stores Inc 0.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IYW and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. TechnologySmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+34.9%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.4 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50095.5%21.7%
Holdings1391311

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +34.9% and VB returned +15.2%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYW or VB?
IYW charges 0.37% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of IYW and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYW against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYW-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources