Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYW vs URTH: how they differ

IYW and URTH hold 32% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and URTH hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYW and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYWURTH
NVIDIA CORPORATION16.25%5.64%
APPLE INC.13.65%5.04%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION3.99%3.50%
ALPHABET INC.7.84%2.43%
BROADCOM INC.3.78%2.21%
ALPHABET INC.6.34%2.01%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.81%1.51%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.2.98%1.20%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.3.50%0.92%
INTEL CORPORATION2.56%0.57%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION1.99%0.44%
ORACLE CORPORATION1.67%0.43%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYWOnly in URTH
SANDISK CORPORATION 0.96%AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.86%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC 0.12%TESLA, INC. 1.35%
TD SYNNEX CORPORATION 0.11%ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 0.97%
LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION 0.10%JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 0.90%
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 0.09%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 0.72%
ONTO INNOVATION INC. 0.09%ASML Holding N.V. 0.69%
GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE, INC. 0.07%EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 0.67%
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC. 0.07%VISA INC. 0.60%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IYW and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isU.S. TechnologyMSCI World
Total return, 1 year+34.9%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.4 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.24%
Already in the S&P 50095.5%70.3%
Holdings1391322

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or URTH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +34.9% and URTH returned +17.4%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYW or URTH?
IYW charges 0.37% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of IYW and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 32% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYW against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW against URTH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYW-URTH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources