Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYW vs RSP: how they differ

IYW and RSP hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and RSP hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYW and RSP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYWRSP
INTEL CORPORATION2.56%0.38%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.3.50%0.33%
SANDISK CORPORATION0.96%0.32%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION0.91%0.31%
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.0.46%0.29%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC.0.40%0.27%
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED0.30%0.27%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED1.57%0.27%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED1.18%0.26%
ON SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION0.25%0.33%
Coherent Corp.0.34%0.24%
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.1.21%0.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYWOnly in RSP
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. 0.86%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34%
CLOUDFLARE, INC. 0.39%Ciena Corp. 0.30%
STRATEGY INC 0.32%Centene Corp. 0.29%
SNOWFLAKE INC. 0.28%NXP Semiconductors N.V. 0.28%
FLEX LTD. 0.21%Humana Inc. 0.27%
ZOOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 0.16%Lumentum Holdings Inc. 0.26%
Astera Labs, Inc 0.15%Nucor Corp. 0.25%
Everpure, Inc 0.14%Comfort Systems USA, Inc. 0.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

IYW and RSP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isU.S. TechnologyS&P 500 equal weight
Total return, 1 year+34.9%+14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.4 pts−2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.20%
Already in the S&P 50095.5%99.1%
Holdings139503

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or RSP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +34.9% and RSP returned +14.8%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYW or RSP?
IYW charges 0.37% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of IYW and 99% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYW against RSP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW against RSP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYW-RSP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources