Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IYW vs MGK: how they differ

IYW and MGK hold 66% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IYW and MGK hold 66% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IYW and MGK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIYWMGK
NVIDIA CORPORATION16.25%13.29%
APPLE INC.13.65%12.19%
ALPHABET INC.7.84%5.93%
ALPHABET INC.6.34%4.67%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION3.99%7.52%
BROADCOM INC.3.78%4.28%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.3.50%3.20%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.81%4.08%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION1.99%1.93%
KLA CORPORATION1.41%1.48%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.1.92%1.13%
INTEL CORPORATION2.56%1.10%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IYWOnly in MGK
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%Amazon.com Inc 4.47%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED 1.57%Tesla Inc 3.93%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT 1.32%Eli Lilly & Co 3.41%
ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 1.21%Visa Inc 1.82%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.18%Mastercard Inc 1.47%
SALESFORCE, INC. 0.99%GE Vernova Inc 1.21%
VERTIV HOLDINGS CO 0.77%Netflix Inc 1.12%
ADOBE INC. 0.62%Arista Networks Inc 0.77%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IYW and MGK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. TechnologyMega Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+34.9%+14.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+17.4 pts−2.6 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50095.5%99.2%
Holdings13956

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

MGK in plain words

MGK is an index equity fund tracking the Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 63.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IYW or MGK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IYW returned +34.9% and MGK returned +14.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IYW or MGK?
IYW charges 0.37% a year and MGK charges 0.07%, so MGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IYW and MGK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of IYW and 99% of MGK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 66% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IYW against MGK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IYW against MGK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IYW-MGK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources