Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IXUS vs VT: how they differ

IXUS and VT hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IXUS and VT hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IXUS and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIXUSVT
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA0.59%0.23%
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK0.43%0.16%
Allianz SE0.41%0.16%
Siemens Energy AG0.39%0.14%
SHOPIFY INC.0.35%0.13%
UBS Group AG0.33%0.12%
Enbridge Inc.0.28%0.11%
Deutsche Telekom AG0.28%0.10%
BANK OF MONTREAL0.25%0.10%
GSK PLC0.25%0.09%
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE0.24%0.09%
Zurich Insurance Group AG0.24%0.09%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IXUSOnly in VT
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.04%NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
ASML Holding N.V. 1.32%Apple Inc 3.53%
SK hynix Inc. 1.15%Microsoft Corp 2.73%
Tencent Holdings Limited 0.91%Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.75%Alphabet Inc 2.04%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.69%Broadcom Inc 1.74%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.67%Alphabet Inc 1.61%
Novartis AG 0.66%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

IXUS and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore MSCI Total International StockTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.06%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%55.2%
Holdings418510042

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4185 positions, with the top ten at 12.6%.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IXUS or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IXUS returned +22.2% and VT returned +18.9%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IXUS or VT?
IXUS charges 0.07% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IXUS and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IXUS and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IXUS against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IXUS against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IXUS-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources