Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IXUS vs VGK: how they differ

IXUS and VGK hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF and Vanguard European Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IXUS and VGK hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IXUS and VGK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIXUSVGK
Allianz SE0.41%1.13%
Siemens Energy AG0.39%1.02%
UBS Group AG0.33%0.90%
Deutsche Telekom AG0.28%0.71%
GSK PLC0.25%0.68%
Zurich Insurance Group AG0.24%0.67%
Infineon Technologies AG0.21%0.57%
AXA SA0.19%0.50%
Muenchener Rueckversicherungs-Gesellscha0.18%0.51%
Nokia Oyj0.16%0.43%
Aktiebolaget Volvo0.13%0.35%
Deutsche Post AG0.13%0.35%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IXUSOnly in VGK
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.04%ASML Holding NV 3.63%
ASML Holding N.V. 1.32%HSBC Holdings PLC 2.05%
SK hynix Inc. 1.15%AstraZeneca PLC 1.84%
Tencent Holdings Limited 0.91%Novartis AG 1.84%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.75%Nestle SA 1.69%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.69%Siemens AG 1.41%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.67%Banco Santander SA 1.16%
Novartis AG 0.66%SAP SE 1.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

IXUS and VGK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
VGK
Vanguard European Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore MSCI Total International StockEuropean Stock
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+16.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts−1.0 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.06%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings41851228

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4185 positions, with the top ten at 12.6%.

VGK in plain words

VGK is an index equity fund tracking the European Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1228 positions, with the top ten at 18.1%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IXUS or VGK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IXUS returned +22.2% and VGK returned +16.5%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IXUS or VGK?
IXUS charges 0.07% a year and VGK charges 0.06%, so VGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IXUS and VGK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IXUS and 0% of VGK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IXUS against VGK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IXUS against VGK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IXUS-VGK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources