Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IXUS vs SCHF: how they differ

IXUS and SCHF hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and SCHF returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF and Schwab International Equity ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IXUS and SCHF hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IXUS and SCHF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIXUSSCHF
Novartis AG0.66%0.98%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA0.59%0.91%
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK0.43%0.65%
SAP SE0.41%0.63%
Allianz SE0.41%0.57%
Siemens Energy AG0.39%0.48%
ABB Ltd0.38%0.56%
SHOPIFY INC.0.35%0.49%
UBS Group AG0.33%0.50%
Airbus SE0.29%0.41%
Enbridge Inc.0.28%0.40%
Deutsche Telekom AG0.28%0.39%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IXUSOnly in SCHF
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.04%SK hynix Inc 2.83%
ASML Holding N.V. 1.32%ASML Holding NV 2.12%
SK hynix Inc. 1.15%HSBC Holdings PLC 1.09%
Tencent Holdings Limited 0.91%AstraZeneca PLC 0.94%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.75%Nestle SA 0.88%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.69%Shell PLC 0.81%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.67%Siemens AG 0.78%
Nestle S.A. 0.61%BHP Group Ltd 0.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IXUS and SCHF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesSchwab
What it isCore MSCI Total International StockInternational Equity
Total return, 1 year+22.2%+25.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts+8.0 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings41851476

IXUS in plain words

IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4185 positions, with the top ten at 12.6%.

SCHF in plain words

SCHF is an index equity fund tracking the International Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1476 positions, with the top ten at 14.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IXUS or SCHF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IXUS returned +22.2% and SCHF returned +25.4%, so SCHF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IXUS or SCHF?
IXUS charges 0.07% a year and SCHF charges 0.03%, so SCHF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IXUS and SCHF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IXUS and 0% of SCHF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IXUS against SCHF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IXUS against SCHF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IXUS-SCHF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources