Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IXUS vs REMX: how they differ
Over the year IXUS and REMX finished level, +22.2% against +21.9%, and IXUS charges 0.07% against 0.53%.
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IXUS and REMX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IXUS | REMX |
|---|---|---|
| Lithium Americas Corp | 0.01% | 2.19% |
| Only in IXUS | Only in REMX |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.04% | Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 7.28% |
| ASML Holding N.V. 1.32% | Albemarle Corp 7.24% |
| SK hynix Inc. 1.15% | China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Tec 7.06% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 0.91% | PLS Group Ltd 6.84% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.75% | Lynas Rare Earths Ltd 6.80% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.69% | MP Materials Corp 6.20% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.67% | Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co Ltd 5.94% |
| Novartis AG 0.66% | Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 4.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Thematic ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | VanEck |
| What it is | Core MSCI Total International Stock | Miners and metals |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.2% | +21.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | +4.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.53% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 7.2% |
| Holdings | 4185 | 30 |
IXUS in plain words
IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4185 positions, with the top ten at 12.6%.
REMX in plain words
By weight, 7% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +21.9% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 4.4 pts. It sits 67.6% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IXUS or REMX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IXUS returned +22.2% and REMX returned +21.9%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IXUS or REMX?
- IXUS charges 0.07% a year and REMX charges 0.53%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IXUS and REMX overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IXUS and 7% of REMX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are IXUS and REMX the same kind of fund?
- No. IXUS is an index ETF and REMX is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IXUS against REMX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IXUS-REMX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources