Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWO vs VDC: how they differ
IWO and VDC hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IWO returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWO and VDC hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWO | VDC |
|---|---|---|
| PriceSmart, Inc. | 0.31% | 0.33% |
| Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (The) | 0.21% | 0.27% |
| WD-40 Co. | 0.20% | 0.22% |
| Vita Coco Co., Inc. (The) | 0.20% | 0.34% |
| Interparfums, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.21% |
| Marzetti Co. (The) | 0.12% | 0.19% |
| Turning Point Brands, Inc. | 0.09% | 0.16% |
| Energizer Holdings, Inc. | 0.07% | 0.14% |
| Boston Beer Co., Inc. (The) | 0.06% | 0.17% |
| Oil-Dri Corp. of America | 0.05% | 0.09% |
| National Beverage Corp. | 0.04% | 0.13% |
| Andersons, Inc. (The) | 0.03% | 0.29% |
| Only in IWO | Only in VDC |
|---|---|
| Moog, Inc. 0.73% | Walmart Inc 14.76% |
| BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.68% | Costco Wholesale Corp 12.04% |
| MaxLinear, Inc. 0.67% | Procter & Gamble Co/The 9.27% |
| Argan, Inc. 0.66% | Coca-Cola Co/The 8.72% |
| JFrog Ltd. 0.60% | Philip Morris International Inc 4.66% |
| Krystal Biotech, Inc. 0.58% | PepsiCo Inc 4.30% |
| ESCO Technologies, Inc. 0.56% | Altria Group Inc 3.91% |
| FirstCash Holdings, Inc. 0.54% | Mondelez International Inc 2.69% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Russell 2000 Growth | Consumer Staples |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +4.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.5 pts | −12.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.24% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 86.6% |
| Holdings | 1133 | 103 |
IWO in plain words
IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1133 positions, with the top ten at 6.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VDC in plain words
VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWO or VDC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +17.0% and VDC returned +4.6%, so IWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWO or VDC?
- IWO charges 0.24% a year and VDC charges 0.09%, so VDC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWO and VDC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWO and 87% of VDC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWO against VDC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWO-VDC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources