Which returned more over the last year, IWO or SHV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +17.0% and SHV returned +3.6%, so IWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWO or SHV?

IWO charges 0.24% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so SHV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWO vs SHV: how they differ

IWO and SHV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWO returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWO	Only in SHV
Moog, Inc. 0.73%	United States of America 17.17%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.68%	United States of America 12.38%
MaxLinear, Inc. 0.67%	United States of America 9.88%
Argan, Inc. 0.66%	United States of America 8.60%
JFrog Ltd. 0.60%	United States of America 8.55%
Krystal Biotech, Inc. 0.58%	United States of America 8.38%
ESCO Technologies, Inc. 0.56%	United States of America 6.85%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc. 0.54%	United States of America 6.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IWO and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF	SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Russell 2000 Growth	0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.0%	+3.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.5 pts	−13.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.24%	0.15%
Holdings	1133	13

IWO in plain words

IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1133 positions, with the top ten at 6.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or SHV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +17.0% and SHV returned +3.6%, so IWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWO or SHV?: IWO charges 0.24% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so SHV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWO against SHV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWO against SHV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWO-SHV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources