Which returned more over the last year, IWO or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +17.0% and PULS returned +4.2%, so IWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWO or PULS?

IWO charges 0.24% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWO vs PULS: how they differ

IWO and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWO returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWO and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWO	Only in PULS
Moog, Inc. 0.73%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.68%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
MaxLinear, Inc. 0.67%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
Argan, Inc. 0.66%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
JFrog Ltd. 0.60%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
Krystal Biotech, Inc. 0.58%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
ESCO Technologies, Inc. 0.56%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc. 0.54%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

IWO and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	PGIM
What it is	Russell 2000 Growth	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.0%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.5 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.24%	0.15%
Holdings	1133	553

IWO in plain words

IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1133 positions, with the top ten at 6.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWO or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWO returned +17.0% and PULS returned +4.2%, so IWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWO or PULS?: IWO charges 0.24% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWO against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWO against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWO-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources