Which returned more over the last year, IWM or PDBC?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +21.2% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWM or PDBC?

IWM charges 0.19% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWM vs PDBC: how they differ

IWM and PDBC are both equity index funds, and over the year PDBC returned more, +55.2% against +21.2%.

iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

IWM and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	Russell 2000	Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy
Total return, 1 year	+21.2%	+55.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+3.7 pts	+37.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.19%	0.59%
Holdings	2014	not filed

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

PDBC in plain words

PDBC is an index equity fund tracking the Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or PDBC?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +21.2% and PDBC returned +55.2%, so PDBC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWM or PDBC?: IWM charges 0.19% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWM against PDBC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against PDBC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWM-PDBC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources