Which is cheaper, IWM or LYTE?

IWM charges 0.19% a year and LYTE charges 0.65%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are IWM and LYTE the same kind of fund?

No. IWM is an index ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWM vs LYTE: how they differ

IWM and LYTE are measured over different days, and IWM charges 0.19% against 0.65%.

iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF.

IWM and LYTE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Thematic ETF
Issuer	iShares	Roundhill
What it is	Russell 2000	Photonics and optics
Total return, 1 year	+21.2%	−0.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	−0.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	+3.7 pts	+0.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.19%	0.65%
Holdings	2014	not filed

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

LYTE in plain words

LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it launched on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested against −0.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 11.4% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, IWM or LYTE?: IWM charges 0.19% a year and LYTE charges 0.65%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are IWM and LYTE the same kind of fund?: No. IWM is an index ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWM against LYTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWM against LYTE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWM-LYTE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources