Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWF vs XOP: how they differ

IWF and XOP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XOP returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWF and XOP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWF and XOP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWFXOP
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORPORATION0.11%2.64%
TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORPORATION0.08%3.17%
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION0.03%2.75%
PHILLIPS 660.01%2.53%
PERMIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION0.01%2.54%
MATADOR RESOURCES COMPANY0.00%2.47%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWFOnly in XOP
NVIDIA CORPORATION 13.85%PBF Energy Inc 2.91%
APPLE INC. 6.72%Delek US Holdings Inc 2.81%
ALPHABET INC. 6.18%Expand Energy Corp 2.80%
BROADCOM INC. 5.21%CNX Resources Corp 2.78%
ALPHABET INC. 4.98%EQT Corp 2.75%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.11%Antero Resources Corp 2.68%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 3.86%HF Sinclair Corp 2.68%
TESLA, INC. 3.65%Par Pacific Holdings Inc 2.65%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IWF and XOP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
XOP
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isRussell 1000 growthSPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Total return, 1 year+7.0%+52.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.5 pts+34.9 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.35%
Holdings36851

IWF in plain words

IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XOP in plain words

XOP is a commodity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +52.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 26.8% below its high of Jun 23, 2014 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWF or XOP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and XOP returned +52.4%, so XOP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWF or XOP?
IWF charges 0.18% a year and XOP charges 0.35%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWF against XOP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against XOP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWF-XOP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources