Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWF vs VHT: how they differ
IWF and VHT hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and VHT hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWF | VHT |
|---|---|---|
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY | 2.84% | 14.07% |
| INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. | 0.42% | 2.39% |
| AMGEN INC. | 0.41% | 2.87% |
| MCKESSON CORPORATION | 0.26% | 1.45% |
| CENCORA, INC. | 0.16% | 0.79% |
| ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. | 0.12% | 0.63% |
| NATERA, INC. | 0.11% | 0.47% |
| REVOLUTION MEDICINES, INC. | 0.11% | 0.40% |
| ABBVIE INC. | 0.10% | 6.10% |
| IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC. | 0.10% | 0.71% |
| DEXCOM, INC. | 0.08% | 0.46% |
| CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. | 0.08% | 0.74% |
| Only in IWF | Only in VHT |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 13.85% | Johnson & Johnson 8.48% |
| APPLE INC. 6.72% | UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.46% |
| ALPHABET INC. 6.18% | Merck & Co Inc 4.67% |
| BROADCOM INC. 5.21% | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 2.93% |
| ALPHABET INC. 4.98% | Gilead Sciences Inc 2.64% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.11% | Abbott Laboratories 2.36% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 3.86% | Pfizer Inc 2.36% |
| TESLA, INC. 3.65% | Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 1.84% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | VHT Vanguard Health Care Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Russell 1000 growth | Health Care |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.0% | +21.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.5 pts | +4.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 93.6% | 85.6% |
| Holdings | 368 | 401 |
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VHT in plain words
VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or VHT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or VHT?
- IWF charges 0.18% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWF and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWF-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources