Which is cheaper, IWF or LYTE?

IWF charges 0.18% a year and LYTE charges 0.65%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are IWF and LYTE the same kind of fund?

No. IWF is an index ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWF vs LYTE: how they differ

IWF and LYTE are measured over different days, and IWF charges 0.18% against 0.65%.

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF.

IWF and LYTE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF	LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Thematic ETF
Issuer	iShares	Roundhill
What it is	Russell 1000 growth	Photonics and optics
Total return, 1 year	+7.0%	−0.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	−0.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−10.5 pts	+0.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.18%	0.65%
Holdings	368	not filed

IWF in plain words

IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

LYTE in plain words

LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it launched on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested against −0.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 11.4% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, IWF or LYTE?: IWF charges 0.18% a year and LYTE charges 0.65%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are IWF and LYTE the same kind of fund?: No. IWF is an index ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWF against LYTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against LYTE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWF-LYTE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources