Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWF vs KRE: how they differ
IWF and KRE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and KRE returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWF and KRE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWF | KRE |
|---|---|---|
| WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION | 0.01% | 1.28% |
| Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. | 0.00% | 1.37% |
| Popular, Inc. | 0.00% | 1.33% |
| Only in IWF | Only in KRE |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 13.85% | Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp 1.37% |
| APPLE INC. 6.72% | UMB Financial Corp 1.37% |
| ALPHABET INC. 6.18% | Citizens Financial Group Inc 1.37% |
| BROADCOM INC. 5.21% | Glacier Bancorp Inc 1.36% |
| ALPHABET INC. 4.98% | Associated Banc-Corp 1.36% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.11% | Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc 1.35% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 3.86% | First Interstate BancSystem Inc 1.35% |
| TESLA, INC. 3.65% | Fulton Financial Corp 1.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | KRE State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | Russell 1000 growth | SPDR S&P Regional Banking |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.0% | +16.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.5 pts | −1.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 93.6% | 6.7% |
| Holdings | 368 | 161 |
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
KRE in plain words
KRE is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 161 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWF or KRE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and KRE returned +16.1%, so KRE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWF or KRE?
- IWF charges 0.18% a year and KRE charges 0.35%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWF and KRE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 7% of KRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against KRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWF-KRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources