Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWF vs IYW: how they differ

IWF and IYW hold 65% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWF and IYW hold 65% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWF and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWFIYW
NVIDIA CORPORATION13.85%16.25%
APPLE INC.6.72%13.65%
ALPHABET INC.6.18%7.84%
ALPHABET INC.4.98%6.34%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.11%3.99%
BROADCOM INC.5.21%3.78%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.3.86%2.98%
META PLATFORMS, INC.3.01%2.81%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.2.80%3.50%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.1.70%1.92%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION1.61%1.99%
KLA CORPORATION1.17%1.41%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWFOnly in IYW
TESLA, INC. 3.65%INTEL CORPORATION 2.56%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.84%INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT 1.32%
VISA INC. 1.68%QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.18%
CATERPILLAR INC. 1.44%SALESFORCE, INC. 0.99%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED 1.23%SYNOPSYS, INC. 0.57%
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 1.15%STRATEGY INC 0.32%
GE VERNOVA INC. 0.94%HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY 0.23%
NETFLIX, INC. 0.89%ROPER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 0.23%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IWF and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isRussell 1000 growthU.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+7.0%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.5 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50093.6%95.5%
Holdings368139

IWF in plain words

IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWF or IYW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWF returned +7.0% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWF or IYW?
IWF charges 0.18% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWF and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IWF and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 65% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWF against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWF against IYW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWF-IYW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources