Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWD vs XRT: how they differ

IWD and XRT hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and XRT hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWD and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWDXRT
AMAZON.COM, INC.5.95%1.35%
WALMART INC.1.28%1.27%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION0.66%1.29%
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.0.26%1.22%
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.0.21%1.38%
TARGET CORPORATION0.17%1.38%
AUTOZONE, INC.0.13%1.39%
EBAY INC.0.11%1.42%
THE KROGER CO.0.09%1.17%
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION0.07%1.42%
DOLLAR TREE, INC.0.06%1.48%
TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY0.05%1.39%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWDOnly in XRT
APPLE INC. 5.38%Groupon Inc 1.78%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.89%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.72%Coupang Inc 1.55%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%Victoria's Secret & Co 1.52%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.30%MarineMax Inc 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IWD and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isRussell 1000 valueSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+27.4%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+9.9 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%22.5%
Holdings87075

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and XRT returned −3.0%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWD or XRT?
IWD charges 0.18% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWD and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWD against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources