Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWD vs VHT: how they differ

IWD and VHT hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and VHT hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWD and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWDVHT
JOHNSON & JOHNSON1.72%8.48%
ABBVIE INC.1.15%6.10%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED1.05%5.46%
MERCK & CO., INC.0.89%4.67%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INCORPORATED0.52%2.93%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES0.44%2.36%
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.0.44%2.64%
PFIZER INC.0.39%2.36%
CVS HEALTH CORPORATION0.37%1.83%
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED0.35%1.80%
DANAHER CORPORATION0.34%1.84%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY0.33%1.84%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWDOnly in VHT
AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.95%Eli Lilly & Co 14.07%
APPLE INC. 5.38%Intuitive Surgical Inc 2.39%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.89%Cencora Inc 0.79%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62%Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.63%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46%Natera Inc 0.47%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.72%Dexcom Inc 0.46%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.40%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.30%Insmed Inc 0.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IWD and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isRussell 1000 valueHealth Care
Total return, 1 year+27.4%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+9.9 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%85.6%
Holdings870401

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and VHT returned +21.6%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWD or VHT?
IWD charges 0.18% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWD and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWD against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources