Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWD vs VBK: how they differ

IWD and VBK hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and VBK hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWD and VBK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWDVBK
FLEX LTD.0.17%0.42%
EQT CORPORATION0.09%0.23%
HUBBELL INCORPORATED0.08%0.20%
MKS, INCORPORATED.0.08%0.42%
ILLUMINA, INC.0.07%0.36%
TWILIO INC.0.07%0.88%
ENTEGRIS, INC.0.07%0.77%
OKTA, INC.0.07%0.65%
FIRST SOLAR, INC.0.06%0.34%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION0.06%0.32%
RB Global, Inc.0.06%0.61%
LIBERTY MEDIA CORP - FORMULA ONE GROUP0.06%0.57%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWDOnly in VBK
AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.95%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%
APPLE INC. 5.38%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.89%Astera Labs Inc 1.05%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62%Natera Inc 1.04%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46%Carpenter Technology Corp 0.82%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.72%FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.78%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72%ATI Inc 0.76%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%MasTec Inc 0.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IWD and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isRussell 1000 valueSmall-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+27.4%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+9.9 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%10.2%
Holdings870545

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or VBK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and VBK returned +13.8%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWD or VBK?
IWD charges 0.18% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWD and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWD against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources