Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWD vs ONEQ: how they differ
IWD and ONEQ hold 32% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWD and ONEQ hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IWD | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM, INC. | 5.95% | 6.37% |
| APPLE INC. | 5.38% | 10.04% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 3.89% | 7.32% |
| WALMART INC. | 1.28% | 2.02% |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 1.72% | 1.25% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | 1.30% | 1.04% |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION | 0.66% | 0.93% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 0.63% | 3.03% |
| QUALCOMM INCORPORATED | 0.55% | 0.58% |
| ANALOG DEVICES, INC. | 0.51% | 0.44% |
| Pepsico, Inc. | 0.46% | 0.43% |
| GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. | 0.44% | 0.36% |
| Only in IWD | Only in ONEQ |
|---|---|
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62% | NVIDIA CORP 11.24% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46% | ALPHABET INC 4.85% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72% | BROADCOM INC 4.64% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60% | ALPHABET INC 4.48% |
| ABBVIE INC. 1.15% | TESLA INC 3.58% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 1.05% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.38% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 0.99% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.84% |
| THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 0.96% | LAM RESEARCH CORP 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Russell 1000 value | Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | +27.4% | +20.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +9.9 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.21% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 87.4% |
| Holdings | 870 | 1022 |
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWD or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IWD or ONEQ?
- IWD charges 0.18% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IWD and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 32% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources