Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IWD vs LYTE: how they differ
IWD and LYTE are measured over different days, and IWD charges 0.18% against 0.65%.
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF.
| IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Thematic ETF |
| Issuer | iShares | Roundhill |
| What it is | Russell 1000 value | Photonics and optics |
| Total return, 1 year | +27.4% | −0.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | −0.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +9.9 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.65% |
| Holdings | 870 | not filed |
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.
LYTE in plain words
LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it launched on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested against −0.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 11.4% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, IWD or LYTE?
- IWD charges 0.18% a year and LYTE charges 0.65%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are IWD and LYTE the same kind of fund?
- No. IWD is an index ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against LYTE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-LYTE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources