Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWD vs IYW: how they differ

IWD and IYW hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and IYW hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWD and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWDIYW
APPLE INC.5.38%13.65%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION3.89%3.99%
INTEL CORPORATION1.72%2.56%
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT0.74%1.32%
META PLATFORMS, INC.0.63%2.81%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED0.55%1.18%
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.0.51%1.21%
SALESFORCE, INC.0.35%0.99%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC.0.32%0.40%
SYNOPSYS, INC.0.23%0.57%
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY0.17%0.23%
FLEX LTD.0.17%0.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWDOnly in IYW
AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.95%NVIDIA CORPORATION 16.25%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62%ALPHABET INC. 7.84%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46%ALPHABET INC. 6.34%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72%BROADCOM INC. 3.78%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.50%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.30%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%
WALMART INC. 1.28%LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 1.99%
ABBVIE INC. 1.15%APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 1.92%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IWD and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isRussell 1000 valueU.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+27.4%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+9.9 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%95.5%
Holdings870139

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or IYW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +27.4% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWD or IYW?
IWD charges 0.18% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWD and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWD against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWD against IYW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWD-IYW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources