Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs XLI: how they differ

IWB and XLI hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and XLI hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWB and XLI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWBXLI
CATERPILLAR INC.0.70%8.52%
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY0.56%6.77%
GE VERNOVA INC.0.46%5.48%
RTX CORPORATION0.37%4.44%
THE BOEING COMPANY0.24%2.96%
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION0.23%2.81%
DEERE & COMPANY0.23%2.77%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.0.20%2.55%
VERTIV HOLDINGS CO0.18%2.23%
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION0.18%2.14%
QUANTA SERVICES, INC.0.15%1.88%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC.0.15%1.87%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWBOnly in XLI
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.73%Eaton Corp PLC 2.87%
APPLE INC. 6.03%Trane Technologies PLC 1.89%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.00%Johnson Controls International plc 1.55%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.33%Pentair PLC 0.21%
ALPHABET INC. 3.00%Allegion plc 0.21%
BROADCOM INC. 2.54%
ALPHABET INC. 2.42%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IWB and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
XLI
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isRussell 1000Industrials
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+14.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.8 pts−3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50091.9%100.0%
Holdings102481

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

XLI in plain words

XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or XLI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and XLI returned +14.3%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or XLI?
IWB charges 0.15% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against XLI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWB-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources