Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs VXF: how they differ

IWB and VXF hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and VXF hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWB and VXF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWBVXF
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.0.13%1.19%
SNOWFLAKE INC.0.12%1.03%
BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION0.12%0.93%
CLOUDFLARE, INC.0.11%0.92%
Astera Labs, Inc0.11%0.76%
ROCKET LAB CORPORATION0.08%0.61%
CHENIERE ENERGY, INC.0.07%0.59%
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC.0.07%0.54%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.07%0.52%
ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.0.06%0.47%
NATERA, INC.0.05%0.46%
REVOLUTION MEDICINES, INC.0.05%0.44%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWBOnly in VXF
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.73%Amrize Ltd 0.32%
APPLE INC. 6.03%Viasat Inc 0.14%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.00%Moog Inc 0.14%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.33%Cytokinetics Inc 0.14%
ALPHABET INC. 3.00%Hut 8 Corp 0.14%
BROADCOM INC. 2.54%Argan Inc 0.13%
ALPHABET INC. 2.42%BrightSpring Health Services Inc 0.13%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.88%MaxLinear Inc 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IWB and VXF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isRussell 1000Extended Market
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+14.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.8 pts−3.4 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50091.9%0.0%
Holdings10243365

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

VXF in plain words

VXF is an index equity fund tracking the Extended Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3365 positions, with the top ten at 7.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VXF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and VXF returned +14.1%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or VXF?
IWB charges 0.15% a year and VXF charges 0.05%, so VXF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and VXF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 0% of VXF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against VXF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against VXF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWB-VXF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources