Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs VNQ: how they differ

IWB and VNQ hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and VNQ hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWB and VNQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWBVNQ
WELLTOWER INC.0.23%7.86%
PROLOGIS, INC.0.18%7.02%
EQUINIX, INC.0.15%5.66%
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION0.11%4.55%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.0.10%3.54%
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC.0.09%3.67%
REALTY INCOME CORPORATION0.08%3.12%
PUBLIC STORAGE.0.07%2.54%
VENTAS, INC.0.06%2.20%
CBRE GROUP, INC.0.06%2.26%
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED0.05%1.98%
CROWN CASTLE INC.0.05%2.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWBOnly in VNQ
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.73%Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund 14.67%
APPLE INC. 6.03%CareTrust REIT Inc 0.47%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.00%Terreno Realty Corp 0.36%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.33%Ryman Hospitality Properties Inc 0.34%
ALPHABET INC. 3.00%Essential Properties Realty Trust Inc 0.33%
BROADCOM INC. 2.54%Kite Realty Group Trust 0.30%
ALPHABET INC. 2.42%Macerich Co/The 0.30%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.88%Sabra Health Care REIT Inc 0.27%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IWB and VNQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isRussell 1000US real estate
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+5.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.8 pts−11.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50091.9%63.3%
Holdings1024146

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

VNQ in plain words

VNQ is an index equity fund tracking the US real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 54.9%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VNQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and VNQ returned +5.6%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or VNQ?
IWB charges 0.15% a year and VNQ charges 0.13%, so VNQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and VNQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 63% of VNQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against VNQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against VNQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWB-VNQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources