Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs VGT: how they differ

IWB and VGT hold 36% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and VGT hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWB and VGT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWBVGT
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.73%16.85%
APPLE INC.6.03%14.59%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.00%9.47%
BROADCOM INC.2.54%4.21%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.1.88%4.21%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.1.36%3.21%
INTEL CORPORATION0.88%2.03%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.0.83%1.40%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION0.78%1.56%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.0.67%1.85%
KLA CORPORATION0.57%1.00%
SANDISK CORPORATION0.48%0.98%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWBOnly in VGT
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.33%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.81%
ALPHABET INC. 3.00%NXP Semiconductors NV 0.38%
ALPHABET INC. 2.42%TE Connectivity PLC 0.28%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.79%Hut 8 Corp 0.13%
TESLA, INC. 1.77%Riot Platforms Inc 0.12%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.38%JFrog Ltd 0.11%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.34%MaxLinear Inc 0.11%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.26%Viasat Inc 0.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IWB and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isRussell 1000Information technology
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+35.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.8 pts+17.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50091.9%86.9%
Holdings1024317

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

VGT in plain words

VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VGT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or VGT?
IWB charges 0.15% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 36% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against VGT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWB-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources