Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VBIL?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and VBIL returned +3.8%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWB or VBIL?

IWB charges 0.15% a year and VBIL charges 0.06%, so VBIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs VBIL: how they differ

IWB and VBIL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and VBIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWB	Only in VBIL
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.73%	United States Treasury Bill 6.78%
APPLE INC. 6.03%	United States Treasury Bill 6.10%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.00%	United States Treasury Bill 5.61%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.33%	United States Treasury Bill 5.41%
ALPHABET INC. 3.00%	United States Treasury Bill 5.18%
BROADCOM INC. 2.54%	United States Treasury Bill 5.17%
ALPHABET INC. 2.42%	United States Treasury Bill 5.15%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.88%	United States Treasury Bill 5.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IWB and VBIL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF	VBIL Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Russell 1000	0-3 Month Treasury Bill
Total return, 1 year	+16.7%	+3.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.8 pts	−13.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.06%
Holdings	1024	26

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

VBIL in plain words

VBIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 Month Treasury Bill. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or VBIL?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and VBIL returned +3.8%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or VBIL?: IWB charges 0.15% a year and VBIL charges 0.06%, so VBIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against VBIL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against VBIL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWB-VBIL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources