Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs URTH: how they differ

IWB and URTH hold 72% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and URTH hold 72% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWB and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWBURTH
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.73%5.64%
APPLE INC.6.03%5.04%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.00%3.50%
AMAZON.COM, INC.3.33%2.86%
ALPHABET INC.3.00%2.43%
BROADCOM INC.2.54%2.21%
ALPHABET INC.2.42%2.01%
META PLATFORMS, INC.1.79%1.51%
TESLA, INC.1.77%1.35%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.1.88%1.20%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY1.38%0.97%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.1.36%0.92%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWBOnly in URTH
SANDISK CORPORATION 0.48%ASML Holding N.V. 0.69%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 0.13%HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.35%
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATION 0.10%ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.32%
HONEYWELL AEROSPACE INC. 0.10%Novartis AG 0.31%
Nu Holdings Ltd. 0.07%ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.29%
ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 0.06%Nestle S.A. 0.29%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 0.04%SHELL PLC 0.26%
MKS, INCORPORATED. 0.04%Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IWB and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isRussell 1000MSCI World
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.8 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.24%
Already in the S&P 50091.9%70.3%
Holdings10241322

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or URTH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or URTH?
IWB charges 0.15% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 72% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against URTH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWB-URTH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources