Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SLV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and SLV returned +53.8%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IWB or SLV?

IWB charges 0.15% a year and SLV charges 0.50%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs SLV: how they differ

IWB is an equity index fund and SLV a commodity fund, and over the year SLV returned more, +53.8% against +16.7%.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and iShares Silver Trust.

IWB and SLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF	SLV iShares Silver Trust
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Russell 1000	Silver
Total return, 1 year	+16.7%	+53.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.8 pts	+36.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.50%
Holdings	1024	not filed

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

SLV in plain words

SLV is a commodity fund tracking the Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. It sat 45.0% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SLV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and SLV returned +53.8%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or SLV?: IWB charges 0.15% a year and SLV charges 0.50%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against SLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against SLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWB-SLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources