Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs SCHF: how they differ

IWB and SCHF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SCHF returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and Schwab International Equity ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and SCHF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWB and SCHF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWBSCHF
SUNBELT RENTALS HOLDINGS, INC.0.04%0.11%
Restaurant Brands International Inc.0.04%0.09%
RB Global, Inc.0.03%0.07%
BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD.0.03%0.06%
GFL ENVIRONMENTAL INC.0.01%0.03%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWBOnly in SCHF
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.73%SK hynix Inc 2.83%
APPLE INC. 6.03%ASML Holding NV 2.12%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.00%HSBC Holdings PLC 1.09%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.33%Novartis AG 0.98%
ALPHABET INC. 3.00%AstraZeneca PLC 0.94%
BROADCOM INC. 2.54%Royal Bank of Canada 0.91%
ALPHABET INC. 2.42%Nestle SA 0.88%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.88%Shell PLC 0.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IWB and SCHF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesSchwab
What it isRussell 1000International Equity
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+25.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.8 pts+8.0 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50091.9%0.0%
Holdings10241476

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

SCHF in plain words

SCHF is an index equity fund tracking the International Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1476 positions, with the top ten at 14.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SCHF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and SCHF returned +25.4%, so SCHF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or SCHF?
IWB charges 0.15% a year and SCHF charges 0.03%, so SCHF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and SCHF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 0% of SCHF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against SCHF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against SCHF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWB-SCHF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources