Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IWB vs QQQ: how they differ

IWB and QQQ hold 50% of their weight in the same names, and QQQ returned more over the year.

iShares Russell 1000 ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and QQQ hold 50% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IWB and QQQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIWBQQQ
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.73%8.16%
APPLE INC.6.03%7.29%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.00%5.32%
AMAZON.COM, INC.3.33%4.62%
ALPHABET INC.3.00%3.52%
BROADCOM INC.2.54%3.37%
ALPHABET INC.2.42%3.26%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.1.88%4.80%
META PLATFORMS, INC.1.79%2.97%
TESLA, INC.1.77%3.46%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.1.36%3.70%
INTEL CORPORATION0.88%2.52%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IWBOnly in QQQ
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.38%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.84%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.34%Honeywell International Inc. 0.66%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.26%Shopify Inc. 0.64%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.88%ASML Holding N.V. 0.62%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 0.82%MercadoLibre, Inc. 0.38%
VISA INC. 0.82%NXP Semiconductors N.V. 0.36%
CATERPILLAR INC. 0.70%PDD Holdings Inc. 0.25%
ABBVIE INC. 0.64%ARM Holdings PLC 0.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IWB and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isRussell 1000Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+23.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.8 pts+5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50091.9%96.7%
Holdings1024101

IWB in plain words

IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or QQQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.7% and QQQ returned +23.0%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IWB or QQQ?
IWB charges 0.15% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 97% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 50% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IWB against QQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IWB against QQQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IWB-QQQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources