Which returned more over the last year, IUSB or ONEQ?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUSB returned −0.3% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IUSB or ONEQ?

IUSB charges 0.06% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IUSB vs ONEQ: how they differ

IUSB and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IUSB and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IUSB	Only in ONEQ
United States of America 0.38%	NVIDIA CORP 11.24%
United States of America 0.37%	APPLE INC 10.04%
United States of America 0.37%	MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%
United States of America 0.37%	AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%
United States of America 0.36%	ALPHABET INC 4.85%
United States of America 0.36%	BROADCOM INC 4.64%
United States of America 0.36%	ALPHABET INC 4.48%
United States of America 0.35%	TESLA INC 3.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IUSB and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF	ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Fidelity
What it is	Core Universal USD Bond	Nasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year	−0.3%	+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.8 pts	+3.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.06%	0.21%
Holdings	17819	1022

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IUSB or ONEQ?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUSB returned −0.3% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IUSB or ONEQ?: IUSB charges 0.06% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IUSB against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IUSB against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IUSB-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources