Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ITOT vs VDE: how they differ

ITOT and VDE hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VDE returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and Vanguard Energy Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and VDE hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ITOT and VDE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingITOTVDE
Exxon Mobil Corp.0.78%21.37%
Chevron Corp.0.42%14.53%
ConocoPhillips0.17%5.79%
Williams Cos., Inc. (The)0.12%3.65%
Valero Energy Corp.0.11%3.19%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.0.10%3.29%
SLB Ltd.0.10%3.49%
EOG Resources, Inc.0.09%3.06%
Phillips 660.09%2.98%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.0.09%2.61%
Targa Resources Corp.0.08%2.31%
Baker Hughes Co.0.07%2.65%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ITOTOnly in VDE
NVIDIA Corp. 6.64%TechnipFMC PLC 1.23%
Apple, Inc. 5.82%Weatherford International PLC 0.34%
Microsoft Corp. 3.80%Transocean Ltd 0.29%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%Valaris Ltd 0.28%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%Plains GP Holdings LP 0.24%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.45%Hess Midstream LP 0.23%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%Noble Corp PLC 0.21%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78%International Seaways Inc 0.18%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

ITOT and VDE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
VDE
Vanguard Energy Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore S&P Total U.S. Stock MarketEnergy
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+50.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts+33.1 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%81.6%
Holdings2497105

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

VDE in plain words

VDE is an index equity fund tracking the Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +50.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 82% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 64.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or VDE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and VDE returned +50.6%, so VDE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or VDE?
ITOT charges 0.03% a year and VDE charges 0.09%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ITOT and VDE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 82% of VDE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITOT against VDE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against VDE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ITOT-VDE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources