Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ITOT vs VBR: how they differ

ITOT and VBR hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and ITOT returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and VBR hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ITOT and VBR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingITOTVBR
Jabil, Inc.0.06%0.87%
EMCOR Group, Inc.0.05%0.40%
Qnity Electronics, Inc.0.05%0.37%
EQT Corp.0.04%0.18%
Steel Dynamics, Inc.0.04%0.34%
NRG Energy, Inc.0.04%0.66%
Centene Corp.0.04%0.34%
MKS, Inc.0.04%0.32%
Tapestry, Inc.0.04%0.64%
Atmos Energy Corp.0.04%0.62%
Hubbell, Inc.0.04%0.15%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.0.04%0.59%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ITOTOnly in VBR
NVIDIA Corp. 6.64%Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%
Apple, Inc. 5.82%Bunge Global SA 0.36%
Microsoft Corp. 3.80%Flex Ltd 0.32%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%Jazz Pharmaceuticals PLC 0.31%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%Everest Group Ltd 0.30%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.45%RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd 0.29%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%Aptiv Holdings Ltd 0.28%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78%Pentair PLC 0.27%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

ITOT and VBR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore S&P Total U.S. Stock MarketSmall-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+16.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%30.5%
Holdings2497840

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or VBR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and VBR returned +16.3%, so ITOT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or VBR?
ITOT charges 0.03% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ITOT and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITOT against VBR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ITOT-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources