Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ITOT vs USMV: how they differ

ITOT and USMV hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and ITOT returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and USMV hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ITOT and USMV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingITOTUSMV
NVIDIA Corp.6.64%1.64%
Microsoft Corp.3.80%1.56%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.1.26%1.42%
Johnson & Johnson0.84%1.44%
Apple, Inc.5.82%0.82%
Visa, Inc.0.78%0.94%
Exxon Mobil Corp.0.78%1.60%
Walmart, Inc.0.68%0.88%
Eli Lilly & Co.1.30%0.66%
Cisco Systems, Inc.0.64%1.81%
AbbVie, Inc.0.61%0.63%
Mastercard, Inc.0.57%1.15%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ITOTOnly in USMV
Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%Chubb Limited 1.50%
Tesla, Inc. 1.62%WASTE CONNECTIONS, INC. 1.28%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.20%ACCENTURE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.75%
Intel Corp. 0.90%LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.69%
Lam Research Corp. 0.74%TE CONNECTIVITY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.59%
Caterpillar, Inc. 0.67%ARCH CAPITAL GROUP LTD. 0.50%
KLA Corp. 0.54%AON PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.43%
GE Aerospace 0.53%MercadoLibre, Inc. 0.34%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

ITOT and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore S&P Total U.S. Stock MarketMSCI USA Min Vol Factor
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+6.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−10.9 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%94.8%
Holdings2497170

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or USMV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and USMV returned +6.6%, so ITOT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or USMV?
ITOT charges 0.03% a year and USMV charges 0.15%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ITOT and USMV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 95% of USMV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITOT against USMV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against USMV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ITOT-USMV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources