Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ITOT vs RDVY: how they differ

ITOT and RDVY hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and RDVY hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ITOT and RDVY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingITOTRDVY
Alphabet, Inc.2.87%2.12%
NVIDIA Corp.6.64%1.91%
Micron Technology, Inc.1.78%1.83%
Meta Platforms, Inc.1.70%1.50%
Microsoft Corp.3.80%1.45%
Apple, Inc.5.82%1.44%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.20%1.91%
Applied Materials, Inc.0.79%4.69%
Visa, Inc.0.78%1.82%
Lam Research Corp.0.74%4.42%
Costco Wholesale Corp.0.57%1.73%
Mastercard, Inc.0.57%1.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ITOTOnly in RDVY
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 1.97%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.45%ACCENTURE PLC 1.00%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%EVEREST GROUP LTD 0.54%
Tesla, Inc. 1.62%WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL PLC 0.39%
Eli Lilly & Co. 1.30%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.30%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.26%
Intel Corp. 0.90%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

ITOT and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFirst Trust
What it isCore S&P Total U.S. Stock MarketFirst Rising Dividend Achievers
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+22.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts+4.5 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.47%
Already in the S&P 50088.3%94.4%
Holdings249771

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or RDVY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and RDVY returned +22.0%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ITOT or RDVY?
ITOT charges 0.03% a year and RDVY charges 0.47%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ITOT and RDVY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 94% of RDVY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ITOT against RDVY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against RDVY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ITOT-RDVY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources