Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ITOT vs IWD: how they differ
ITOT and IWD hold 55% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ITOT and IWD hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ITOT | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| Apple, Inc. | 5.82% | 5.38% |
| Microsoft Corp. | 3.80% | 3.89% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 3.20% | 5.95% |
| Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. | 1.26% | 2.62% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.20% | 2.46% |
| Intel Corp. | 0.90% | 1.72% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 0.84% | 1.72% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | 0.78% | 1.60% |
| Walmart, Inc. | 0.68% | 1.28% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | 0.64% | 1.30% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 1.70% | 0.63% |
| AbbVie, Inc. | 0.61% | 1.15% |
| Only in ITOT | Only in IWD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. 6.64% | LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.67% |
| Alphabet, Inc. 2.87% | EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.39% |
| Broadcom, Inc. 2.45% | Chubb Limited 0.34% |
| Alphabet, Inc. 2.29% | MEDTRONIC PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.28% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78% | JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LI 0.23% |
| Tesla, Inc. 1.62% | ACCENTURE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.21% |
| Eli Lilly & Co. 1.30% | CRH PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.20% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.30% | AON PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.19% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market | Russell 1000 value |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +27.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | +9.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 88.3% | 90.2% |
| Holdings | 2497 | 870 |
ITOT in plain words
ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.
IWD in plain words
IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ITOT or IWD?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ITOT returned +17.2% and IWD returned +27.4%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ITOT or IWD?
- ITOT charges 0.03% a year and IWD charges 0.18%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ITOT and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 88% of ITOT and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 55% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ITOT against IWD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ITOT-IWD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources