Which returned more over the last year, ILF or SPSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and SPSB returned +2.5%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ILF or SPSB?

ILF charges 0.47% a year and SPSB charges 0.04%, so SPSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ILF vs SPSB: how they differ

ILF and SPSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.

iShares Latin America 40 ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ILF and SPSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ILF	Only in SPSB
VALE S.A. 8.48%	SALESFORCE INC 0.59%
Nu Holdings Ltd. 8.25%	AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.46%
Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 7.11%	BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.44%
Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. 5.68%	CITIGROUP INC 0.44%
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 5.19%	MORGAN STANLEY 0.40%
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 4.83%	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 0.39%
CREDICORP LTD. 4.26%	PFIZER INVESTMENT ENTER 0.39%
Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. 4.11%	SPRINT CAPITAL CORP 0.39%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

ILF and SPSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF	SPSB State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	Latin America 40	SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+33.4%	+2.5%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+15.9 pts	−15.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.47%	0.04%
Holdings	45	1599

ILF in plain words

ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 55.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPSB in plain words

SPSB is a bond fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILF or SPSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and SPSB returned +2.5%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ILF or SPSB?: ILF charges 0.47% a year and SPSB charges 0.04%, so SPSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ILF against SPSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ILF against SPSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ILF-SPSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources