Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ILF vs IWD: how they differ

ILF and IWD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.

iShares Latin America 40 ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ILF and IWD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ILF and IWD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingILFIWD
SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION2.34%0.04%
MILLICOM INTERNATIONAL CELLULAR S.A.1.42%0.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ILFOnly in IWD
VALE S.A. 8.48%AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.95%
Nu Holdings Ltd. 8.25%APPLE INC. 5.38%
Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 7.11%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.89%
Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. 5.68%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62%
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 5.19%JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46%
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 4.83%INTEL CORPORATION 1.72%
CREDICORP LTD. 4.26%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.72%
Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. 4.11%EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

ILF and IWD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ILF
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isLatin America 40Russell 1000 value
Total return, 1 year+33.4%+27.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+15.9 pts+9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.47%0.18%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%90.2%
Holdings45870

ILF in plain words

ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 55.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILF or IWD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and IWD returned +27.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ILF or IWD?
ILF charges 0.47% a year and IWD charges 0.18%, so IWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ILF and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ILF and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ILF against IWD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ILF against IWD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ILF-IWD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources