Which returned more over the last year, ILF or IUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ILF or IUSB?

ILF charges 0.47% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ILF vs IUSB: how they differ

ILF and IUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.

iShares Latin America 40 ETF and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ILF and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ILF and IUSB both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding	ILF	IUSB
Banco de Chile	1.46%	0.00%

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ILF	Only in IUSB
VALE S.A. 8.48%	United States of America 0.38%
Nu Holdings Ltd. 8.25%	United States of America 0.37%
Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 7.11%	United States of America 0.37%
Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. 5.68%	United States of America 0.37%
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 5.19%	United States of America 0.36%
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 4.83%	United States of America 0.36%
CREDICORP LTD. 4.26%	United States of America 0.36%
Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. 4.11%	United States of America 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

ILF and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF	IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Latin America 40	Core Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year	+33.4%	−0.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+15.9 pts	−17.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.47%	0.06%
Holdings	45	17819

ILF in plain words

ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 55.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILF or IUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +33.4% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ILF or IUSB?: ILF charges 0.47% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ILF against IUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ILF against IUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ILF-IUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources