Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJT vs XRT: how they differ

IJT and XRT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and IJT returned more over the year.

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJT and XRT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJT and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJTXRT
Etsy, Inc.0.79%1.48%
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.0.55%1.34%
PriceSmart, Inc.0.55%1.51%
Urban Outfitters, Inc.0.40%1.32%
Warby Parker, Inc.0.21%1.64%
National Vision Holdings, Inc.0.17%1.46%
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.0.12%1.33%
Buckle, Inc. (The)0.09%1.29%
Winmark Corp.0.08%1.47%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJTOnly in XRT
FormFactor, Inc. 1.38%Groupon Inc 1.78%
Viasat, Inc. 1.35%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
Argan, Inc. 1.24%Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 1.22%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
Krystal Biotech, Inc. 1.08%Coupang Inc 1.55%
ESCO Technologies, Inc. 1.00%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
Alkermes plc 0.97%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%
Everus Construction Group, Inc. 0.94%Victoria's Secret & Co 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJT and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJT
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isS&P Small-Cap 600 GrowthSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+17.6%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.1 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.35%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%22.5%
Holdings34775

IJT in plain words

IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 347 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJT or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJT returned +17.6% and XRT returned −3.0%, so IJT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJT or XRT?
IJT charges 0.18% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so IJT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJT and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJT and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJT against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJT against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJT-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources