Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJT vs SCHH: how they differ
IJT and SCHH hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and IJT returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJT and SCHH hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJT | SCHH |
|---|---|---|
| Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. | 0.90% | 0.52% |
| Terreno Realty Corp. | 0.53% | 0.49% |
| Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. | 0.48% | 0.46% |
| Macerich Co. (The) | 0.41% | 0.44% |
| Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. | 0.34% | 0.36% |
| Outfront Media, Inc. | 0.38% | 0.33% |
| Millrose Properties, Inc. | 0.30% | 0.31% |
| Tanger, Inc. | 0.33% | 0.29% |
| National Health Investors, Inc. | 0.24% | 0.25% |
| Curbline Properties Corp. | 0.33% | 0.20% |
| LXP Industrial Trust | 0.19% | 0.22% |
| Urban Edge Properties | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Only in IJT | Only in SCHH |
|---|---|
| FormFactor, Inc. 1.38% | Welltower Inc 9.64% |
| Viasat, Inc. 1.35% | Prologis Inc 8.97% |
| Argan, Inc. 1.24% | Equinix Inc 4.89% |
| BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 1.22% | Simon Property Group Inc 4.48% |
| Krystal Biotech, Inc. 1.08% | Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.36% |
| ESCO Technologies, Inc. 1.00% | American Tower Corp 4.35% |
| Alkermes plc 0.97% | Realty Income Corp 4.00% |
| Everus Construction Group, Inc. 0.94% | Public Storage 3.41% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | SCHH Schwab U.S. REIT ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth | US REIT |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.6% | +9.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.1 pts | −7.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 74.0% |
| Holdings | 347 | 117 |
IJT in plain words
IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 347 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SCHH in plain words
SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJT or SCHH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJT returned +17.6% and SCHH returned +9.8%, so IJT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJT or SCHH?
- IJT charges 0.18% a year and SCHH charges 0.07%, so SCHH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJT and SCHH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJT and 74% of SCHH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJT against SCHH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJT-SCHH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources