Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJS vs VYM: how they differ

IJS and VYM hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJS and VYM hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJS and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJSVYM
MATCH GROUP INC0.97%0.04%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY0.84%0.04%
LKQ CORP0.73%0.03%
JACKSON FINANCIAL INC0.61%0.03%
SM ENERGY COMPANY0.65%0.03%
CONAGRA BRANDS INC0.69%0.03%
POOL CORP0.75%0.03%
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP0.66%0.03%
PIPER SANDLER COMPANIES0.25%0.03%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS INC0.65%0.02%
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC0.20%0.02%
MAGNOLIA OIL & GAS CORP0.52%0.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJSOnly in VYM
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30%Broadcom Inc 8.07%
CARMAX INC 0.82%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
VICTORIA'S SECRET & COMPANY 0.72%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
ENPHASE ENERGY INC 0.71%Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS INC 0.70%Caterpillar Inc 1.73%
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC 0.68%AbbVie Inc 1.57%
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT INC 0.67%Cisco Systems Inc 1.52%
MAXLINEAR INC 0.67%Chevron Corp 1.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IJS and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJS
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P Small-Cap 600 ValueUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+22.1%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.04%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%92.2%
Holdings461608

IJS in plain words

IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJS or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and VYM returned +17.6%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJS or VYM?
IJS charges 0.18% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJS and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJS against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources