Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJS vs SDY: how they differ
IJS and SDY hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJS and SDY hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJS | SDY |
|---|---|---|
| FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO INC | 0.20% | 0.18% |
| AVISTA CORP | 0.20% | 0.16% |
| COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SYSTEM INC | 0.19% | 0.16% |
| H.B. FULLER COMPANY | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| MGE ENERGY INC | 0.17% | 0.14% |
| CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP | 0.17% | 0.14% |
| CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORP | 0.13% | 0.14% |
| ROBERT HALF INC | 0.34% | 0.13% |
| AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY | 0.12% | 0.15% |
| ABM INDUSTRIES INC | 0.28% | 0.12% |
| HAWKINS INC | 0.11% | 0.13% |
| BANCFIRST CORP | 0.09% | 0.11% |
| Only in IJS | Only in SDY |
|---|---|
| MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30% | Verizon Communications Inc 2.15% |
| MATCH GROUP INC 0.97% | Realty Income Corp 2.14% |
| EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 0.84% | Kenvue Inc 1.76% |
| CARMAX INC 0.82% | Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75% |
| KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77% | AbbVie Inc 1.63% |
| POOL CORP 0.75% | QUALCOMM Inc 1.57% |
| LKQ CORP 0.73% | Texas Instruments Inc 1.56% |
| VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC 0.73% | Target Corp 1.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | SDY State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Value | SPDR S&P Dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.1% | +11.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | −6.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 84.6% |
| Holdings | 461 | 155 |
IJS in plain words
IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SDY in plain words
SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJS or SDY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and SDY returned +11.0%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJS or SDY?
- IJS charges 0.18% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so IJS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJS and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources